![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
NEWSLETTER
May 2008 Dear Member Warmest greetings.
I would like to update you on some
of the forthcoming events of interest to you as well as the Society’s
activities since the last newsletter.
1.
SA SPINE
CONGRESS: 28 - 31 MAY 2009 It
is now a year to our next congress
and Dr Frank Snyckers is on track with a great scientific guest list and
proposed program. Please take note
of dates that were forced on us by availability of congress venues and
booking schedules. The congress
will run from Thursday to Sunday, 28 - 31 May 2009 rather that
the usual Wednesday to Saturday format we had in the past. As noted this was not our choice but due to
the only times available at a suitable venue. The
proposed theme for the congress
is “Current Challenges in Spinal Surgery with
Reference to Complication Avoidance and Management”. The
intended guest speakers will be - Lawrence
(Larry) Lenke, - Eugene
Carragee, - Dietrich
Schlenzka, They
are all very eminent in current spinal science. I
urge all members to consider making scientific contributions and presentations
and sharing with us their practice experience and knowledge at this event.
2.
MEDICAL
AID INTERACTIONS
2.1.
Cervical disc prosthesis We
presented the case for cervical disc prosthesis and as from 2008 this
has been routinely funded, based on guidelines as devised from best international
studies available. As this is a rapidly evolving field, I predict that
the treatment selection criteria will change and thus revision of the
current guidelines is likely to occur from time to time.
2.2.
Interspinous process devices These
devices had been funded and then this was stopped. The funders claimed
that they had done so in error, and it was never their intention to fund
such devices because of the lack of sound scientific evidence. When the devices showed up in significant numbers
per month they became aware of the issue and the funding was stopped. In some centres up to 40 devices were being
implanted in some months. We
took up this mater for the members that used the devices. This was a very
contentious issue, because of the varied nature of the devices, and their
proposed use, and thus cross over of information from one device to the
other could not be utilised. Furthermore there are very limited quality
studies to show device efficacy, only one device having some acceptable
evidence basis for use. However
so as not to get involved in specific device accreditation, it was agreed
that funding should be made available for the generic procedure, on the
basis of guidelines as published by the SA Spine Society, and thus the
interspinous process device is being funded at this stage based on published
guidelines on our web page.
2.3.
Intra Operative Navigation Routine
usage of Intra Operative Navigation for spinal cases came under the spot
light quite suddenly and funding was ceased. The
whole process of literature review was undertaken with the funders, and
clearly the evidence is there for the utilisation of Intra Operative Navigation. However the evidence for routine use is not present.
Further more the funders statistics show that only a small percentage
of spinal surgeons used Intra Operative Navigation, and of these a further
small percentage use it almost routinely. A
rational compromise was reached, and Intra
Operative Navigation is now being funded, based on published guidelines
as noted on our web page.
2.4.
Prosthetic monetary limit Based
on information from the previous years average billing practices, a prosthetic
limit of R17 000.00 per lumbar spinal level was imposed. We have started
investigations in this regard, and if there is reasonable evidence to
support change in this amount, then revision is likely to occur in the
future. I foresee that this will be the case, especially due to the recent
rand currency weakness. We will keep you informed of proceeding in this
matter.
2.5.
Orthopaedic
& Neurosurgical Assistants Fees The
Orthopaedic Association has motivated that an assistant fee should be
allowed to each surgeon (0009) when operating together on a case. THIS WILL ONLY APPLY AS FROM 2009. We will keep
you informed relating to developments in this regard.
3.
NEUROSURGICAL
CONGRESS – As
noted in the previous newsletter, the Neurosurgical Society and the Neurosurgical
Congress Committee has so organised its program so as to devote the first
day (Monday) to spinal topics, and the ethics lecture early on the Tuesday
morning. This
should give members an opportunity to make contact, and share views and
current opinions and also get CPD allocations. The registration details
can be found on http://www.precisionconferences.co.za/event1.asp.
4.
AO SPINE
MEMBERSHIP South African spine surgeons have for many years benefited
from the training offered by the AO Foundation largely via the AO Foundation’s
connection with Synthes in AOSPINE
E-PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP As from January 2008 membership of AOSpine will require registration and
payment of affiliation fees. In return for these fees members will enjoy
a range of online benefits including
INSPINE EVIDENCE
BASED SPINE SURGERY SPINE JOURNAL
OF SPINAL DISORDERS JBJS JOURNAL
OF ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA and now EUROPEAN
SPINE JOURNAL.
Dr Norman Fisher-Jeffes has negotiated that South African based spine specialists
be granted a special concession for 2008. We have been allocated 70 E-PROFESSIONAL Membership’s at a 70% reduction
on the normal subscription rate of CHF
150 / US$ 120/ Euro 90.
In rand terms this means you
will pay only CHF 40/US$ 36 / Euro 27. To benefit from this offer you need to contact
5.
CADAVER
SPINE APPROACH COURSE – The 6th Cadaver
based spinal approaches course will be held on the 20-21 November 2008
at the This course instructs on
anatomical approaches as well as a variety of instrumentation techniques.
It allows surgeons of all skill levels to familiarise themselves with
the relevant anatomy and learn new techniques in a risk free environment.
If
interested contact Dr Robert Dunn on info@spinesurgery.co.za or your local Synthes / Medtronic representative.
6.
FURTHER
GUIDELINES PUBLISHED ON WEBSITE Guidelines
for the use of intra operative navigation have been posted, together with
revision of those previously published . I
would urge members to review these as they relate to their practices,
and give us feed back with respect to any anomaly based on current valid
scientific studies, that should be consider, so as to review current guides. With kind regards. GIAN MARUS PRESIDENT: THE SA SPINE
SOCIETY
|